Author Archives: Rick Ladd

About Rick Ladd

Unknown's avatar
I retired over14 years ago, though I've continued to work on and off since then. Mostly I'm just cruising, making the most of what time I have remaining. Although my time is nearly up, I still care deeply about the kind of world I'll be leaving to those who follow me and, to that end, I am devoted to seeing the forces of repression and authoritarianism are at least held at bay, if not crushed out of existence. I write about things that interest me and, as an eclectic soul, my interests run the gamut from science to spirituality, governance to economics, art and engineering. I'm hopeful one day my children will read what I've left behind.

My 78th & Fuck Zuck

Even though I was unfairly booted from all Meta products I was using (FB, Insta, and Threads), I’ve managed to create another persona and have re-connected with many of the people I was “friends” with previously. As a result, I received a lot of birthday wishes this past Wednesday (06/04). I did my best to individually recognize everyone who sent me a greeting (and yes, I’m aware that FB makes it exceedingly easy to do so, but it doesn’t force one to do it). I also wanted to post a general “thank you” and felt the need to explain why this birthday had so much meaning for me.

Believe it or not, aelizabeth_mehyh3821 isn’t me!

A bit less than two and a half years ago, I started having trouble walking from my bedroom to the kitchen. I was serially exhausted and couldn’t figure out what was happening. My doctor had me fitted with a Holter Monitor, which records your heart rate 24/7 for seven days.

The results were sobering. On one night my heart rate fell to 26 BPM; distressingly slow. I was referred to a cardiologist and, after some consultation and discussion about the alternatives, I decided to undergo pacemaker implant surgery. That was two years ago last March 8 (but who’s counting?).

Six months before that I was working in a warehouse, driving a forklift, lifting lots and lots of fairly heavy boxes, and climbing both ladders and storage racks (when I was in a hurry and only needed one box). While working there, I was playing twilight golf with a bunch of former colleagues from Rocketdyne. One of the guys I played with was a Manager of Manufacturing Engineering and he suggested I apply for a position, which I did.

I had an interview and was offered a position. Unfortunately, although I had passed the drug test five previous times, I had always been smoking and had only been using edibles for a while. I didn’t realize the cannabis from them stayed in your system longer than smoking does. I failed and the job was rescinded. I was heartbroken and humiliated. My younger daughter berated me mercilessly and I felt shame; not because I was using Cannabis, but because I wasn’t careful enough to pass the test.

I can’t say for sure that my bradycardia was caused by the weight of that loss (I would have been paid a lot of money for my efforts) and the humiliation I felt over having to tell the guys who I was going to be working with that I wouldn’t be there because I failed a drug test. Regardless, although the implant surgery was a success and I had more energy than I’d had for a while, over the next two years my health deteriorated to the point I honestly didn’t think I had much longer to live.

I was experiencing horrible, arthritic-like pain in nearly every joint in my body. I underwent a battery of tests for a couple of months. Eventually, my doctors (there were several by now) all suggested that the root cause of all this was the Hepatitis C virus I had been carrying asymptomatically for close to forty years. I was first offered treatment in early 2017, when I had just had to leave a two-year stint at Aerojet Rocketdyne. The co-pay was $30,000 and, since I was experiencing no symptoms, I didn’t bother.

This year I decided to take the 12-week regimen of Epclusa, and the co-pay was only $2,000. Still not cheap, but I was really suffering. There were times when I had to shuffle along rather than walk. I had fallen a couple of times and the joint pain was frequently excruciating.

I finished the regimen a couple of months ago. If I test negative for the virus six months after completion, I will be considered cured. I am, however, gaining strength, recovering my balance, and feeling much better. So much so that I’ve begun working for a lawyer and am seeking a few more clients. Turns out my law degree, knowledge of AI, and my KM experience are a unique combination, and I am presenting myself to attorneys as one who can help them keep track of their knowledge, use AI to enhance their practice, and help as a legal assistant when necessary.

I welcome the challenge and am excited for what the future holds, despite my many chronic conditions and fairly advanced age. Keeping busy doing things I love and am good at should keep me going for at least a few more years. Who knows? Maybe a decade. My pacemaker’s battery still has about twelve years of life remaining … and it can be replaced.

Back to my 78th birthday. I’m truly feeling energized by the recovery I’ve made and the road I’ve put myself on. Although it was a bit devastating to lose my Facebook, Instagram, and Threads accounts at the beginning of the year (according to Meta, it was because I broke the rules on an Instagram account that wasn’t me and trying to straighten it out was both impossible and infuriating) I’m thankful for those friends I’ve managed to re-connect with, as well as the new friends I’ve made recently. I’m thankful for all of them. Life would be less sweet without their presence.


Due Process? Don’t Make Me Laugh.

There’s a reason we supposedly revere the Constitution in this country—at least, that’s what every flag-waving “patriot” keeps screaming about at school board meetings and on Twitter (sorry, “X”). But I’d like to know: When was the last time any of these self-anointed constitutional scholars actually read the damn thing? Or, for that matter, when was the last time anyone in the Trump administration—especially over at the DOJ—acted like the rule of law applied to them?

Let’s talk about due process—that bedrock idea that the government can’t just do whatever it wants to whomever it wants, whenever it wants. We’ve got the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, both pretty clear on the whole “life, liberty, or property” thing not being taken away without, you know, a fair shake. But apparently, “due process” is now just a quaint little phrase, like “all men are created equal” or “no taxation without representation”—nice for speeches, but utterly disposable when it gets in the way of locking up immigrants or crushing dissent.

The Trump Playbook: Due Process, Schmue Process

Remember the family separations at the border? Remember “zero tolerance”? Turns out, due process is just another speed bump for the machinery of cruelty. We watched as people, most of whom don’t speak English and know nothing of our legal system, were herded through sham hearings—sometimes via video conference, sometimes with no lawyer at all. Some never saw a judge. Kids, for crying out loud, defending themselves in court. This is what passes for justice in MAGA-land.

And let’s not forget the DOJ, which, under Trump, became less “Department of Justice” and more “Department of Just Us (If You’re White and Rich).” Look at how they handled peaceful protests—send in the troops, gas the crowds, call anyone with a sign an “antifa terrorist” and pretend the First Amendment is just an optional suggestion. The chilling effect on dissent? That’s not “law and order.” That’s authoritarianism with a Fox News chyron.

Ignorance by Design

It’s not just ignorance; it’s willful, performative ignorance. The Trump crowd knows exactly what they’re doing. They count on people not knowing or caring about “due process” until it’s their own ass in the crosshairs. The cruelty is the point. It’s a feature, not a bug.

And let’s be real: this didn’t start with Trump. But under his administration, the gloves came off and the mask slipped. Suddenly, it was okay to say the quiet part out loud: “We don’t want these people here. We don’t want these people protesting. We don’t want these people voting.” Due process? Only if you’re the right kind of person, with the right kind of bank account, skin tone, or political loyalty.

Why It Matters (And Why We Can’t Give Up)

Look, I’m a 77-year-old white guy who’s been lucky enough to scrape by in this system. But the rule of law isn’t just some abstract principle to hang on a classroom wall. It’s the only thing standing between us and the abyss. When we let due process slide—whether for immigrants, protesters, or anyone else—we’re all in danger.

History has a funny way of repeating itself. I’ve seen what happens when people obey in advance, shrug their shoulders, and say, “Not my problem.” That’s how you lose a democracy—one ignored constitutional right at a time. If you think they won’t come for you, eventually, you’re not paying attention.

We need to demand better—from our courts, from our government, from each other. And we need to remember: due process is not a privilege. It’s a right, for everyone. If we let them take it away from the most vulnerable, it’s only a matter of time before it’s gone for all of us.

So, to the DOJ, to the administration, and to every would-be strongman with a flag pin and a Twitter account: Read the damn Constitution. And maybe, just once, try following it.


The Art of Putting: Or, How to Turn the Green into Your Frenemy

Ah, putting—a small word for an enormous source of joy, frustration, and the occasional golf-induced existential crisis. If driving is the glamorous star of the show and iron shots are the dependable character actors, putting is that quirky sidekick who can steal the whole scene… or ruin it entirely. It’s an art form, a science, and sometimes a cruel joke. But fear not! With a little humor, some pseudo-wisdom, and a lot of practice, you too can learn to navigate the treacherous terrain of the green.

Reading the Green: The Golf Detective’s First Case

The first step in putting is reading the green, which is essentially a Sherlock Holmes-level investigation into the subtle mysteries of gravity and grass. Is the green sloping left to right? Right to left? Are there hidden bumps that could send your ball off course, like a toddler with a sugar rush? Stand behind the ball and take a good, long look at the terrain. Squinting dramatically, like you’re in a sports movie, is optional but highly recommended for effect.

Walk around the putt’s line, crouch a bit (a great excuse to stretch those hamstrings), and try to visualize the path your ball will take. If you’re on a course where the greens are as smooth as polished marble, congratulations! If you’re dealing with something that resembles your uncle’s backyard, well, let’s just say you’ll need to be extra creative.

Grain: The Green’s Personality (and Mood Swings)

Now, let’s talk about grain. If the green were a person, the grain would be its personality—sometimes calm and agreeable, other times erratic and rebellious. Grain refers to the direction in which the grass grows. If you’re putting with the grain, the ball will roll faster, almost as if the green is giving you a gentle nudge of encouragement. Putting against the grain, however, is like trying to run through molasses while carrying a backpack filled with bricks.

To figure out the grain, look at the grass. It often appears shinier when you’re looking with the grain, and darker when you’re against it. Another trick is to look at the hole itself—if one side of the cup is slightly ragged, the grain is growing in that direction. Yes, the cup itself is tattling on the green’s mood. Use that information wisely, like a golf gossip.

Speed, Aim, and the Elusive Perfect Stroke

Once you’ve read the green and considered the grain, it’s time to actually putt. No pressure, right? The key here is finding the right balance of speed and aim. Too fast, and you’ll blow past the hole like a Formula 1 car on a joyride. Too slow, and you’ll end up short, staring at the ball as it rolls to an anticlimactic halt. (This is the golfing equivalent of sending a text and immediately regretting it.)

Practice your stroke with confidence, even if deep down you’re questioning every life decision that brought you to this point. Focus on a smooth, consistent motion. And remember: putting is as much about feel as it is about technique. Channel your inner Zen master. Or, if that fails, channel your inner stubborn mule and refuse to give up until the ball goes in.

The Final Word (and Hopefully, the Final Putt)

Putting is a test of patience, precision, and your ability to laugh at yourself when things go awry. Sure, it’s frustrating, but it’s also deeply satisfying when you finally sink that tricky ten-footer. So embrace the challenge, enjoy the process, and remember: even the pros miss putts sometimes. But hey, at least you’re not on national television when it happens.


The Secret to Innovation Isn’t Learning More—It’s Forgetting Less

In today’s hyper-connected, information-overloaded world, companies spend billions on training programs, knowledge-sharing platforms, and professional development. The conventional wisdom is simple: the more you learn, the better you’ll perform. But what if the key to innovation isn’t about learning more, but rather about forgetting less?

It might sound counterintuitive, but this subtle shift in perspective can transform how you think about knowledge management and creativity in your organization.


The Forgetting Curve: Your Biggest Knowledge Leak

The problem starts with how our brains work. Research by German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus introduced the concept of the “forgetting curve.” Essentially, we forget up to 50% of newly learned information within an hour and as much as 90% within a week—unless we take deliberate action to reinforce it.

This isn’t just an individual issue. Consider the collective implications for organizations where employees undergo training, attend meetings, or share insights. If 90% of that knowledge is forgotten or left unutilized, what’s the point of investing in learning initiatives?

Forgetting is natural, but it’s also a huge leak in your company’s knowledge pipeline. And while many organizations focus on teaching employees new skills or introducing the latest tools, they often overlook the need to help employees retain and apply what they’ve already learned.


The Innovation Gap: How Forgetting Limits Creativity

Innovation thrives at the intersection of knowledge and application. It’s not about the sheer volume of information you have but how effectively you can connect the dots between what you know and what you do.

When knowledge is forgotten, those dots disappear, making it harder to generate fresh ideas, solve problems, or build on past successes. Employees waste time reinventing the wheel, repeating mistakes, or duplicating effort because critical lessons learned have been buried in the sands of time.

The result? A company that feels stuck, constantly chasing the next big thing while failing to capitalize on the wealth of knowledge it already has.


Flipping the Script: How to Forget Less

So, how do you ensure your organization forgets less—and builds a culture of continuous innovation? Here are three actionable strategies:

1. Reinforce Learning Through Spaced Repetition

Spaced repetition is a proven technique for combating the forgetting curve. Instead of a single training session, reinforce critical knowledge over time. For example, follow up on workshops with microlearning modules, quizzes, or discussion groups that revisit key concepts. This repetition strengthens memory retention and ensures that knowledge sticks.

2. Capture Knowledge in Accessible Systems

Don’t let valuable insights evaporate into thin air after a meeting or brainstorming session. Use knowledge management tools to document and organize critical information. Platforms like Notion, Confluence, or SharePoint make it easy to store and retrieve knowledge so that your team can access it when they need it most.

3. Foster a Culture of Knowledge Sharing

Encourage employees to share their learnings and experiences with their peers. This could be through informal lunch-and-learns, internal blogs, or mentorship programs. When knowledge is shared, it’s reinforced—not just for the sharer but for the audience as well.


The Competitive Edge: Retention Over Acquisition

The companies that will thrive in the future aren’t the ones that simply learn the most but the ones that retain and apply their knowledge effectively. By focusing on forgetting less, you can unlock the full potential of your team’s creativity, reduce inefficiencies, and build a culture of innovation that lasts.

Remember, innovation isn’t about accumulating more—it’s about making the most of what you already have. What steps will you take today to help your organization forget less?


At The End Of The Day

I prompted Poe’s chatbot, “Assistant”, with the following. Its response seems almost like it enjoyed doing this.

“Write a corporate pep talk of at least 300 words that sounds reasonable, but is nothing more than corporate gibberish.”


Team:

As we embark on the next fiscal quarter, it’s imperative that we synergize our verticals and double down on our core competencies to truly unlock cross-functional scalability. The paradigm shifts in our industry demand an agile mindset, and we are uniquely positioned to leverage our robust infrastructure to capitalize on emerging opportunities. Now is the time for us to think outside the box, lean into our KPIs, and disrupt the status quo with unprecedented velocity.

 Our mission is clear: we must amplify our operational bandwidth while maintaining a laser-sharp focus on customer-centric deliverables. This is not just about meeting expectations—it’s about exceeding them at every touchpoint. By fostering an ecosystem of innovation and embedding a culture of excellence into our DNA, we can achieve a seamless alignment between our strategic objectives and ground-level execution.

 Remember, success in today’s dynamic landscape is not a linear journey. It’s about embracing iterative growth, harnessing actionable insights, and pivoting proactively when faced with volatility. Let’s not forget the power of collaboration—our ability to break down silos, ideate collectively, and drive end-to-end solutions will define our trajectory as market leaders.

 I urge each of you to take ownership of your deliverables and approach challenges with a growth mindset. Let’s circle back to our organizational north star and ensure that every touchpoint in our value chain is optimized for maximum impact. The low-hanging fruit is ours to harvest, but we must also keep an eye on the blue-sky opportunities that will future-proof our success.

 In closing, I want to reiterate that our greatest asset is you—the people who make this organization thrive. Together, let’s move the needle, operationalize our vision, and deliver unparalleled value to our stakeholders. The sky is not the limit—it’s just the beginning. Let’s make it happen!


Evolving with AI

If Artificial Intelligence takes over in the future, and that seems to be what causes the most hand-wringing nowadays, wouldn’t it most likely follow that we will have evolved into cyborgs? Is there anything actually WRONG with that? Unlike Data, from Star Trek: The Next Generation, we’d almost certainly bring our emotions with us (unless evolution proves them to be detrimental to our long-term survival.) It can easily be argued that emotions, at least destructive ones, are not in our overall best interest, while positive ones are evolutionary assets.

When you think about it, doesn’t it seem strange, if not useless, to worry about our evolutionary path going forward? Artificial selection makes it clear we can at least guide that path, so it’s surely important to understand how we have evolved and then project those changes that may or may not require our attention. So thinking about where we’re headed is useful. My contention is that worrying about it is, well, a waste of time.

I have no doubt we will one day be a true spacefaring species; that is, if we don’t kill ourselves off first. That should require some hefty biological, psychological, and perhaps a dozen or so other aspects of the human being, changes in order to adapt.


American Descent

Something new. Bluesky is my goto social media site and I just now discovered I can paste in posts and, in this case, my response to this particular post by Robert Reich. Thought I would give it a test spin. This may become a staple of my blog moving forward. I tend to do a lot more writing there than I’ve been doing here. This way I can blend in the two.

Remember: Almost all of us are the descendants of immigrants who fled persecution, or were brought to America under duress, or sought better lives for themselves and their descendants.Politicians who stoke fear and hatred over immigration want you to forget this.Do not.

Robert Reich (@rbreich.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T18:45:06.973088Z

I'm a descendant of Ukrainian Jews who fled the pogroms of the late 19th and earlier 20th century. I'm appalled at the country I once thought of as the benevolent savior of my family becoming the hateful, fearful bastion of racism and bigotry it now appears to be.

Rick Ladd (@retreado.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T19:59:50.873Z

The Crisis of Leadership: Toxic Masculinity, Bullying, and the Betrayal of Accountability

The meeting on February 28, 2025, at the White House, bringing together Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, serves as a stark illustration of the political, economic, and social chaos that toxic leadership has wrought on the United States. On one side of the table sat Trump and Vance, embodying the very traits that have plunged America deeper into division and dysfunction—traits of toxic masculinity, bullying, gaslighting, and victim-shaming. On the other sat Zelenskyy, a leader of integrity and composure, whose professionalism only magnified the disgrace of his American counterparts. This juxtaposition was more than symbolic; it was a glaring indictment of the corrosive leadership that continues to undermine the United States and its standing in the world.

Toxic masculinity, as personified by Trump and echoed in Vance’s rhetoric, has become a cornerstone of American political dysfunction. Their performative bravado and obsession with power over progress perpetuate a culture where collaboration is seen as weakness and empathy is dismissed outright. Trump’s tenure has been a masterclass in this destructive ethos, where bluster replaces leadership and domination replaces diplomacy. Vance, once a self-styled critic of Trump’s excesses, has since become a sycophantic disciple, mimicking his mentor’s disdain for nuance and complexity. Together, they exemplify a system that rewards aggression over thoughtfulness, leaving the American people to bear the brunt of their failures. This toxic culture has seeped into every corner of American life, from policymaking to public discourse, eroding the very foundations of democracy.

Bullying has become an accepted strategy in their political arsenal, weaponized to intimidate opponents and silence dissent. Trump’s long history of personal attacks, from mocking disabled reporters to belittling political adversaries, has set a precedent for cruelty as a form of governance. Vance, too, has adopted this playbook, using inflammatory language to marginalize those who challenge his agenda. This normalization of hostility has turned public discourse into a battlefield, where the loudest and most caustic voices drown out reasoned debate. The result is a nation more divided than ever, unable to agree on even the most fundamental truths. Meanwhile, Zelenskyy, facing a war in his homeland, demonstrates the strength that comes from uniting people rather than tearing them apart. His calm resolve in the face of existential threats is a sobering reminder of how far American leadership has fallen.

Gaslighting, a hallmark of Trump’s reign, continues to sow confusion and distrust among the American public. From denying election results to dismissing the severity of crises like COVID-19, Trump has repeatedly manipulated reality to serve his own ends. Vance, despite his past critiques of Trump’s dishonesty, has embraced this strategy, casting doubt on credible institutions and experts. This deliberate distortion of truth not only erodes public confidence but also paralyzes meaningful action. When leaders deny facts and vilify those who challenge them, they create an environment of apathy and hopelessness. Zelenskyy, by contrast, has faced unimaginable challenges with honesty and transparency, fostering trust among his people and the global community. His leadership underscores the moral bankruptcy of those who would rather gaslight than govern.

The culture of victim-shaming perpetuated by Trump and Vance is perhaps the most insidious aspect of their toxic leadership. Rather than addressing systemic injustices, they shift blame onto the very people harmed by them. Whether it’s dismissing the struggles of marginalized communities or ridiculing survivors of abuse, their rhetoric perpetuates cycles of oppression and inequality. This refusal to take accountability emboldens abusers and undermines efforts to create a more just society. Zelenskyy’s leadership stands in stark contrast; he has consistently championed the resilience and dignity of his people, refusing to vilify the vulnerable even in the face of extraordinary challenges.

Compounding this crisis is the complicity of women who support leaders like Trump and Vance, enabling their toxic behavior and policies. Their subservience to patriarchal norms legitimizes the very power structures that oppress them. This dynamic is a critical but often overlooked factor in America’s current turmoil. By propping up men who embody toxic masculinity, these women reinforce the cycles of inequality and dysfunction that plague the nation. Zelenskyy’s leadership, grounded in mutual respect and shared purpose, offers a stark alternative to this corrosive dynamic.

As the meeting unfolded, the contrast between Trump and Vance’s bluster and Zelenskyy’s quiet professionalism could not have been more glaring. While Zelenskyy sought solutions to a war that threatens global stability, Trump and Vance seemed more interested in posturing and self-aggrandizement. Their presence was a reminder of everything wrong with American leadership: the prioritization of ego over ethics, power over people, and division over unity. In Zelenskyy, we see a leader who understands the gravity of his responsibilities, who values truth and accountability, and who inspires rather than alienates. In Trump and Vance, we see the embodiment of a toxic culture that has brought America to the brink.

It is time to reckon with the consequences of this toxic leadership. The United States cannot afford to continue down a path where aggression, dishonesty, and victim-shaming are rewarded while integrity and collaboration are dismissed. We must demand better from our leaders and ourselves. The contrast between Trump, Vance, and Zelenskyy is a stark reminder of what is at stake: the very soul of our democracy and the future of our nation. Let this meeting serve as a wake-up call, not just to those in power but to every American who believes in a better, more just future.


The Legacy of DOGE

Recently I’ve been studying Generative AI (ChatGPT, et al), and learning how to use it effectively. This is somewhat difficult as I’m not currently employed and haven’t been for about two and a half years. As a result, I have few specific tasks to work on and discover how to implement AI, either to automate or to speed up their completion. Regardless, I’ve subscribed to Quora’s Poe, which is a compilation of bots to which I now have 10,000 points to use every day for the next year. As well, I’ve secured inexpensive access to several other services which allow me to experiment with image creation, reasoning and writing, and general search capabilities.

Today, something I read caused me to wonder what, if any, historical significance there was to the term DOGE, which is performative Nazi Elon Musk’s name for his chainsaw approach to dismantling our government. It would be remiss of me not to point out I’ve believed for virtually the entirety of my adult life (that would be 56 years if you count from age 21) that the government of the United States is in dire need of an overhaul … the economy too! However, what is happening now is NOT what I would consider either an efficient or an effective method of achieving progress.

At any rate, I asked one of the bots to which I have access (Web-search, which costs 15 points per prompt) to explain the word/concept’s history to me. Here’s what I got. BTW – I cross-checked the response with ChatGPT and received very similar responses. The answers I received from the bot are in italics, below. The simple prompts I used are included prior to the answer I received and are in red.


The word “doge” historically represents the title of an elected lord and head of state in several Italian city-states, most notably Venice and Genoa, during the medieval and Renaissance periods. Here are some key points about its historical significance:

  1. Etymology: The term “doge” is derived from the Venetian language, which in turn comes from the Latin word “dux,” meaning leader or duke. This reflects the role of the doge as a leader within the governance structure of these republics.
  2. Role and Governance: The doge was not a monarch but an elected official who governed alongside a complex system of councils. This system included the Great Council, the Council of Ten, and the Senate, which helped to balance power and prevent the abuse of authority. The doge typically ruled for life, although their power was often limited by these governing bodies.
  3. Historical Context: The first doge of Venice, Paoluccio Anafesto, was elected in 697 AD, and the position continued until the fall of the Venetian Republic in 1797 due to Napoleon’s conquests. This long duration highlights the stability and continuity of the doge’s role in Venetian governance.
  4. Cultural Impact: The doges played a crucial role in Venice’s development as a maritime power and cultural center. They were involved in significant events, such as the Fourth Crusade, and presided over periods of territorial expansion and artistic flourishing.
  5. Legacy: The doge’s palace, a symbol of Venetian power and artistry, remains a significant historical site. The title of doge has also transcended its original context, becoming part of modern internet culture through the “Doge” meme and the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, illustrating its lasting influence.

In summary, the word “doge” historically signifies a unique leadership role within the context of Venetian and Genoese governance, characterized by elected authority, cultural significance, and a legacy that continues to resonate today.



The legacy of the word “doge” extends beyond its historical significance in Venice and Genoa, influencing modern culture and language. However, it also carries some negative connotations that have emerged over time. Here’s a closer look at both aspects:

Positive Legacy

  1. Symbol of Governance: The doge represents a unique form of governance characterized by elected leadership and a system of checks and balances. This model has influenced modern democratic systems, showcasing the importance of limiting power and ensuring representation.
  2. Cultural Heritage: The doges were instrumental in Venice’s rise as a cultural and economic powerhouse during the Renaissance. Their patronage of the arts led to significant contributions in architecture, painting, and literature, which continue to be celebrated today.
  3. Modern References: The term “doge” has found new life in contemporary culture, particularly through the “Doge” meme featuring a Shiba Inu dog, which became an internet sensation. This meme has also inspired the creation of Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency that gained popularity in the digital economy.

Negative Connotations

  1. Corruption and Elitism: Over time, the doge’s role became associated with corruption and elitism. As the Venetian Republic evolved, the political system became increasingly oligarchic, with power concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy families. This shift led to a perception of the doge as a figurehead for a corrupt elite rather than a true representative of the people.
  2. Decline of Power: The eventual decline of Venice as a major power, culminating in its annexation by Napoleon, has also tainted the legacy of the doge. The fall of the Venetian Republic is often viewed as a cautionary tale about the dangers of political stagnation and the failure to adapt to changing circumstances, which can be linked back to the governance style of the doges.
  3. Modern Misinterpretations: In contemporary discussions, particularly in political contexts, the term “doge” can evoke images of ineffective leadership or bureaucratic inefficiency. This is especially relevant in satirical or critical commentary on government figures who are perceived as out of touch or overly ceremonial, drawing parallels to the historical role of the doge as a largely symbolic leader.

Conclusion

While the legacy of the doge is rich with cultural and historical significance, it is also intertwined with themes of corruption, elitism, and political decline. These negative connotations serve as reminders of the complexities of leadership and governance, both in the past and present.


I don’t know about you, but the conclusion makes perfect sense to me given what Musk and his merry band of Incelites are doing to dismantle, especially, every department and service that’s designed to help out regular Americans, who are – IMO – victims of an economic system that exploits and steals from them at every turn.